Caregiving in the US 2009 Report:
Downloads
About this Report
The purpose of this study is to present a portrait of family caregivers today, and to compare it to a portrait of caregivers in the past. A national profile of caregivers first emerged from the 1997 Caregiving in the U.S. study. A related study was conducted in 2004, and now, in 2009, we are presenting the results of the third wave of this important study. Each of the three studies has inquired about certain core elements of caregiving situations, while also exploring new areas.
The core areas that we examined include:
- The prevalence of caregivers in the U.S.
- Demographic characteristics of caregivers and care recipients
- The caregiving situation in terms of the nature of caregiving activities, the intensity and duration of care, the health conditions and living situation of the person to whom care is provided, and other unpaid and paid help provided
- How caregivers are affected by their role, at work, at home, and in their health situation
- Information needs and information sources
This yearâs unique areas of exploration were the use of the Internet for information, what public policies would support caregivers, and the use of technology. For the first time, this yearâs study also includes caregivers of children with special needs, in addition to the caregivers of adults age 50 or older included in the 1997 study and age 18 or older in 2004. In addition, this is the first Caregiving in the U.S. report to present trends from the prior study.
Report Downloads
Overview of Methodology
The interviews include a random sample of 1,000 family caregivers and, to supplement the ethnic minority interviews achieved in that sample, 480 additional interviews with minorities. The interviews break out by race as follows: 858 White, non-Hispanic caregivers, 200 African-American caregivers, 201 Hispanic caregivers, 200 Asian-American caregivers, and 21 caregivers of another race. These results came from screening 6,806 adults.
The random sample interviews were reached using random digit dialing. Geographic density samples were used to target the oversample of African-Americans. For Hispanics and Asian-Americans, a combination of surname and density sampling was used. In addition, Knowledge Networks screened their Asian panel members to pre-identify Asian- American caregivers.
Reading this Report
All figures have been weighted and rounded. In addition, âdonât knowâ or ârefusedâ responses are not always presented in charts and tables. For these reasons, some charts and tables will not add to 100%. The results for multiple response questions may also add to greater than 100%.
For statistical purposes, the base number of respondents shown in each table or graphic is unweighted.
To signal key differences between 2004 and 2009 findings, the report uses an asterisk to highlight any percentage that is significantly higher than the comparison figure.